COMPARISON OF IOP READINGS USING REBOUND I CARE TONOMETER AND PERKINS APPLANATION TONOMETER IN AN AFRICAN POPULATION


Ademola-Popoola DS, ODI AF, Akande TM

Department of Ophthalmology,
University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital,
Ilorin, Nigeria.
dupsyp@yahoo.com

Department of Ophthalmology
Federal Medical Centre, Lokoja, Nigeria.

Department of Epidemiology and Community Health
University of Ilorin, Nigeria.


*Correspondence


Grant support: None
Conflict of Interest: None

Click for full text
ABSTRACT

Background: Accurate intra ocular pressure (IOP) measurement and monitoring using tonometry is a common clinical measurement in diagnosis and management of glaucoma, this is often a challenge in children. The ICare and Perkins tonometers are both handheld tonometers, Perkins uses applanation while ICare measures IOP with a rebound method

Objectives: The objectives of research were to study the IOP values from each tonometer, compare the vale of IOP readings from both tonometers, determined the ease of their use in young children and document the various positions in which the tonometers were used successfully in children.

Methods: Intra ocular pressure readings were taken by two experienced examiners in upright position without sedation or anaesthesia. ICare tonometer was first used. Data were entered and analysed with SPSS 17 statistical package. The means were compared using paired sample T-test. Results: A total of 480 eyes of 240 persons, aged between 2months and 90years with a mean of 46.2±22 years had their intra-ocular pressure range between 3 and 44mmHg( Mean16.3±6) measured using ICare and Perkins tonometry. There was a high correlation, and no statistically significant differences in the mean IOP comparing ICare and Perkins tonometers. The mean difference in average IOP readings between ICare and Perkins was -0.08±2.8 (95% CI: 0.45-0.30; r=0.87, p= 0.68) for right eye and -0.15±2.8mmHg (95% CI -0.53 to 0.23; r=0.86, p=0.44) in the left eye The difference in the average IOP reading from both tonometers was within 2mmHg 288(66.2%) eyes. Among the 147 (33.8%) eyes with a difference in IOP greater than 2mmHg, Perkins was responsible for the higher IOP reading in 76(51.7%) and ICare in 71(48.3%) p=0.56.

Among 42 eyes of 21 children aged =6years, IOP reading was successfully taken in 41(97.6%) and 21(50%) eyes with ICare and Perkins respectively without sedation or anaesthesia.

Conclusion: The IOP readings using the ICare tonometer compares well with that of Perkins tonometer. The ICare was easier to use in young children (=6year olds) without sedation or anaesthesia in this African population.

Keywords: Intra-ocular pressure, Perkins, ICare, Tonometer, Children.

Click for full text

<<< Back to Contents of Volume 4 Number 1 Jan – Mar 2014